The $40 Cybercrime Subscription: Ransomware's Business Model Is Now Better Than Yours
- Kirk M. Anderson, MBA, CISSP, CISM, PMP

- Aug 5
- 5 min read

What Happened: The Industrialization of Cyber crime
The landscape shifted overnight. Ransomware isn't a hacker-in-a-hoodie problem anymore. It's a Fortune 500-caliber business operation targeting your organization.
Here's the reality: For $40 per month, anyone can now subscribe to enterprise-grade ransomware platforms. These aren't underground tools. They're polished SaaS products complete with 24/7 customer support for criminals, user-friendly attack dashboards, affiliate commission programs that pay attackers 70-80% of ransoms, built-in victim negotiation portals, and step-by-step attack playbooks.
The result? US organizations lost $16.6 billion to ransomware in 2024 alone, with attacks increasing roughly 26% year-over-year.
Translation: Cyber-crime has adopted the software as a service business model. Subscription services, affiliate networks, and customer success teams. They have made it easy for even non-technical criminals to use it and they're using it against companies exactly like yours.
Business Impact: The Hidden Enterprise Killers Beyond the Ransom
The ransom payment is the smallest cost. What actually destroys companies is the operational paralysis that follows. With an average of 24-day recovery times for full operations, supply chain disruptions that cascade to customers and partners, and key vendor relationships compromised when their systems are also infected, revenue can decline or even discontinue rapidly.
The customer defection crisis often proves more devastating than the initial attack. Permanent market share loss occurs when customer data appears on dark web leak sites, trust erosion takes years to rebuild, and contract cancellations from enterprise clients with security requirements can eliminate entire revenue streams overnight.
Then comes the regulatory and legal avalanche. SEC disclosure requirements trigger shareholder lawsuits, state attorney general investigations bring potential fines, and individual customer litigation can span years with costs that dwarf the original ransom demand.
The Change Healthcare Reality Check
Change Healthcare demonstrates why traditional thinking fails. They paid a $22 million Bitcoin ransom to the ALPHV/BlackCat group, yet still lost the personal data of 190 million Americans when the attackers leaked it anyway. The total impact required $6 billion in emergency federal funding to stabilize US healthcare, triggered extensive litigation, and resulted in congressional hearings.
Key Insight: They did everything "right" according to old playbooks and still faced enterprise-threatening consequences.
Why Your Mid-Market Size Makes You the Perfect Target
Ransomware operators specifically hunt companies with 200-2,000 employees because they represent optimal victim economics. They are large enough for $500K-$5M ransom demands and sophisticated enough to have valuable data without Fortune 100 defenses. Most mid-market companies are often underinsured or carry policies that exclude certain attack types, and simply can't sustain 3-4 week operational shutdowns without severe business impact.
Recommended Executive Actions: Five Critical Board Decisions
Immediate Leadership Decisions (This Week)
1. Incident Authority Matrix
Decision: Who has authority to approve $2+ million ransom payments at 3 AM?
Action: Create clear decision hierarchy with 24/7 contact protocols
Question for your team: "If this happened Friday at 6 PM, who makes the first call?"
2. Data Classification Audit
Decision: Which stolen datasets would cause maximum business damage?
Action: Rank your "crown jewel" data by potential impact if leaked
Question for your team: "What data theft would force us to notify customers within 72 hours?"
3. Detection Speed Assessment
Decision: How quickly can we detect and isolate a ransomware deployment?
Action: Test current monitoring capabilities with simulated attacks
Question for your team: "Would we learn about a breach from internal monitoring or news coverage?"
Strategic Decisions (30-90 Days)
4. Vendor Risk Overhaul
Decision: Which suppliers could become entry points for attacks against your organization?
Action: Implement continuous vendor security monitoring beyond annual questionnaires
Question for your team: "Can we immediately cut off a compromised vendor without business disruption?"
5. Insurance Gap Analysis
Decision: Does your cyber insurance actually cover modern ransomware scenarios?
Action: Line-by-line policy review with specific focus on RaaS attack coverage
Question for your team: "Would our insurer pay claims if we're hit by a sanctioned criminal group?"
Timeline: Why This Can't Wait
The Urgency Reality
Ransomware attacks are not if. They're when. Industry data shows 5,300+ organizations were hit in 2024 globally, representing a 26% year-over-year increase in attack frequency. The average attack cost has reached $5.13 million, representing a 574% increase since 2019.
Critical Action Timeline
The first two weeks should focus on assessment by conducting simulation exercises, auditing your current security posture, and mapping vendor dependencies. Within the first month, you need to ensure 24/7 endpoint detection deployment, retaining legal counsel specializing in ransomware, and finalizing your executive decision matrix. The first quarter should center on strategic implementation including zero-trust architecture planning, establishing a vendor security audit program, and creating board-level crisis communication protocols.
Why Waiting Increases Risk Exponentially
Each month of delay compounds your exposure. New attack techniques emerge monthly, vendor vulnerabilities evolve continuously, insurance market conditions tighten quarterly, and regulatory expectations increase annually. Organizations that act proactively spend significantly less on incident response than those caught unprepared.
Budget Implications: The Cost of Action vs. Inaction
Investment Required (Action)
Immediate preparation costs for the first 90 days include enhanced monitoring and detection systems, legal retainer for ransomware expertise, and executive training with simulation exercises. Organizations typically see total Year 1 investments that scale with company size and existing security maturity.
Strategic investments over 6-18 months involve zero-trust architecture implementation, vendor security monitoring platforms, and enhanced cyber insurance coverage with premium increases. Total strategic investments vary significantly based on organizational complexity and current infrastructure.
SMB Reality: Scaled Solutions for Smaller Budgets
For organizations under $50M revenue, enterprise-grade solutions aren't always feasible, but effective protection is still achievable. Immediate SMB-focused investments include managed detection and response (MDR) services, basic cyber insurance with ransomware coverage, and employee security training programs. Total Year 1 SMB investments represent a fraction of enterprise costs while delivering meaningful protection.
Low-cost immediate actions can dramatically reduce risk without major budget impact. Implement multi-factor authentication across all systems (often free with existing platforms), establish automated daily backups with offline storage, create incident response contact lists and decision trees (internal cost only), conduct quarterly tabletop exercises using free online resources, and audit user access permissions to remove unnecessary privileges (internal audit cost).
SMB strategic priorities focus on highest-impact, lower-cost solutions over 12-18 months. Deploy business-grade endpoint protection, establish vendor security requirements in contracts (legal review cost), implement network segmentation for critical systems, and create relationships with local cybersecurity consultants for incident response retainers.
Cost of Inaction (Current Threat Reality)
When attacks succeed, direct ransomware costs include average ransom payments of $600K, average total incident costs of $5.13M, substantial daily losses from extended business interruption, and significant legal and regulatory response costs.
The indirect business destruction often proves far more expensive. Customer defection and market share loss create substantial revenue impact over multiple years, vendor relationship damage brings incalculable supply chain costs, executive liability exposure creates personal financial risk for directors and officers, and insurance rate increases can spike dramatically post-incident—with average ransomware insurance claims already increasing 68% in 2024.
The ROI Reality
The math is stark:
Enterprise proactive investment: Significant upfront costs over 18 months
SMB proactive investment: Scaled investments appropriate to organizational size over 18 months
Single incident cost: $5-$25M+ in total business impact
ROI of prevention: Substantial returns based on avoiding catastrophic incidents
Executive Translation: Even modest investments in proactive defenses can prevent business-threatening losses that dwarf the initial security spend.
The Bottom Line: Leadership vs. Liability
The question isn't whether your organization will face a ransomware attack. It's whether your leadership team will be prepared when it happens.
Today's business reality: Cybersecurity failures are now boardroom failures. Directors face personal liability, CEOs face congressional hearings, and companies face existential threats.
The choice is simple: Lead proactively with measured and continuously validated investments in defensive capabilities, or reactively manage crisis, litigation, and potential business survival.
Final Executive Question: Would you rather explain a proactive cybersecurity investment to your board, or a multi-million dollar ransomware incident to the board, your customers, your vendors, and federal investigators?
🔒 Get More Executive Intelligence Like This
Subscribe to the INP² Executive Brief. My weekly cyber briefings built for decision-makers, not IT engineers.
Because in 2025, cybersecurity isn't just an IT risk. It's a boardroom liability.



Comments